|
(non-sequitur) The Search Engine If "the key element of the hypertextual structure
is the link" This dependency cannot be exaggerated. Just imagine surfing the net without the search engine. The Internet would never have taken off. Users would have to rely on what print readers had relied on (before the OPAC was invented)– the word of mouth, reviews by the ‘authorities’, countless lists. They would not have the kind of exposure and independence of choice they have today. There are now numerous search engines online each offering a service of choices to the readers. Search results go up to millions of documents (with of course, increasing irrelevancy) letting the websites compete on an international level. . The search engine can even be a navigation tool where the website is large enough e.g. Blake’s archives However, search engines have also created an ill – the intolerant reader. While the search engine must be the single most essential tool on the Net (next to the hyperlink, it also breeds intolerance and impatience in the user. The user would not stay with the text if they cannot find what they want there but has become in general quicker at judging and at discarding the text. A reason is that many of the texts on the Internet are amateurish. Editorial discretion and printing costs have ensure that the content of a printed book are kept at a minimal standard (with certain notable exceptions such as the Singapore Ghost Stories). With the Internet, there is no guarantee for any kind of a standard. The user therefore must pick and choose quickly. Because of the search engine, the user can immediately go elsewhere for information s/he needs. There is no inconvenience in discarding a text for an other. (((back to Essay 2))) |